The Billion Pound Swindle - Are Injury Lawyers Unneeded?

Hiring a lawyer in a personal injury claim is a must-havebacks these claims up with some powerful and
cost for anyone considering making a claim. The merepersuasive proposals: instead of today's stand-off
thought of going through the legal wrangling withoutbetween claimants and insurers mediated by costly
someone on side who knows the law intimately islawyers intent on dragging the case out for as long as
enough to put most people off making a claimpossible, a system for smaller claims would be set up
altogether. But new research from the heart of theto allow the quick and efficient passage of cases
lion's den itself - the Association of British Insurers (ABI)through the system. Undoubtedly, the wording of
- says that that freeing people from the need to useinsurance contracts would have to be tightened up so
lawyers could slash car insurance premium rates.less room for interpretation is left to lawyers to exploit.
Primarily, those making claims of less thanThe director general of the ABI Stephen Haddrill said:
£25,000 would save literally billions of pounds a"Our proposals are a blueprint for a much-needed
year if they managed to make the claims sans lawyer.reform of the personal injury compensation system.
The problem lies with the extortionate legal costsToo many people are waiting far too long to get a fair
associated with hiring the lawyers. Out of every poundpay-out." But at what price would this 'fair pay-out' be
awarded in compensation to the victims of injury, justsecured at? The Association of Personal Injury
seven pence goes to the claimant. The rest is mostlyLawyers (APIL) rightly points out that victims are likely
dished out to the injury lawyers themselves, with someto get far less money (albeit more quickly) overall: initial
charging as much as £165 an hour, the tradecompensation sums offered by insurers are
union Unite has claimed. The result? Up to £2by-and-large around half of that eventually secured by
billion a year is cruelly taken from the injured party'slawyers. APIL is unlikely to support the new proposals -
hands and put into that of the overpaid, unnecessaryit in effect puts them out of a job - and is not quick to
legal teams.state how much of the victim's extra cash actually
So what is being proposed to combat thesegets spent on them. It could actually end up being more
aberrations of justice? A schematic model has beenthan if the claimant has just settled for the insurance
introduced - an effective pay-out ceiling - that wouldcompany's' payout. Just having the option to take a
cover 95% of all claims. Instead of the highly variablesmaller claim and have less hassle is surely a battle
methods used at the moment, a set of tariff paymentswon for the already hard-done by consumer, hacking
would be used to speed up the claims to just sixtheir way through the thickets of insurance policy.
months. At present, they typically take aJack is an author of several articles pertaining to No
mind-numbingly slow three-years to process - andWin No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury
that's when the legal costs tend to mount up. The ABIClaims and other legal articles.