In-Vehicle Cell Phone Use - Assessing Accident Risk

Mobile phone use in motor vehicles has increased at amotor vehicle. In light of the ongoing research for, and
remarkable rate over the past 15 years. Yet it isby, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
undeniable that utilizing a cell phone while driving can( we should at least consider their policy on using cell
affect driver performance as it relates to the overallphones while driving that states "The primary
safe operation of a vehicle. There are a number ofresponsibility of the driver is to operate a motor vehicle
things to consider in deciding whether the trade off insafely. The task of driving requires full attention and
convenience is worth the potential risks associatedfocus. Cell phone use can distract drivers from this
with the distraction created by a cell phone. Given thetask, risking harm to themselves and others. Therefore,
fact that the individual driver (and/or business owner)the safest course of action is to refrain from using a
ultimately pays for the resulting consequencescell phone while driving."Source: Cellular
associated with an auto or truck accident (financial,Telecommunications & Internet Association
emotional and physical lose); it is prudent to seek out(CTIA)According to the CTIA, there are currently more
relevant and reliable information in making a decision. Inthan 218 million subscribed cell phone users as of
doing so, consider the source, as well as the possibleAugust 2006 (compared to some 4.3 million in 1990).
motivation behind the information provider.Source: USBased on the extraordinary growth of cellular phone
LegislationIn the United States, there are currently noindustry and the CTIA's advisory role, it may be of
federal laws prohibiting driving while using a cell phone.value to think about their point of view on this topic. In
In an earnest attempt to find a solution, some statesdoing so, you might consider a document found on the
(New Jersey, New York, the District of Columbia,CTIA's web site, entitled "SafeDrivingTalkingPoints2"
Connecticut and pending in California) have passed(created June 6, 2006) that states "But for some
laws barring hand-held cell phone use while driving.reason, legislative efforts to prevent driver distractions
Typical fines range from $50 to $100 for drivershave been narrowly focused on wireless phone use.
caught using a hand-held device. While theseAccording to government statistics and respected
lawmakers have the public's best interest at heart byresearch studies, this approach is well off point."
levying fines, not all entities weighing in on this subjectConsider that, there are more than 220 million vehicles
are likely to have the same incentive.Source:on the road and a similar number of cell phones
Manufacturer ResearchAs the result of ansubscribers. Based on the amount of time customers
independent study (found on their web site in the formmight potentially spend using their cell phones in
of a press release), Plantronics, a manufacturer ofvehicles, we would hope to find the CTIA an objective
headsets states, "71% of drivers steer moresource. Given the magnitude of the revenue at stake,
accurately when using a headset with a mobile phone".is a greater degree of scrutiny in order here? Would
They point out that the study was to discover if athe CTIA hold a different position if they were liable, in
person using a mobile phone improves driving if he orpart, for distracted vehicle accidents?Source: Leading
she uses a headset. Stephen Wilcox, Ph.D., Principal ofUniversities & Independent ResearchersWhile there
Design Science (independent research firm) states,are a number of valuable studies on this subject, the
"Driving with both hands on the wheel is the safestfollowing are extensive research projects provided by
option for motorists who use mobile phones, andhighly accredited organizations:1) Virginia Tech
headsets are tools to enable that improvement."Transportation Institute researchers and the National
Considering the source, is this statement characteristicHighway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
of scientific research? Is it objective and free oftracked 100 cars and their drivers for a year; they
marketing bias? Could it confuse individuals into thinkingdiscovered that talking on cell phones caused more
that cell phones are safe as long as you arecrashes, near-crashes and other incidents than other
hands-free? Additionally, found toward the end of thedistractions (100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, April
press release, is a comment by a senior director of2006).2) University of Utah researchers determined
product marketing. Beth Johnson states, "It's importantthat motorists on the blood-alcohol threshold of being
to keep in mind that our study is not intended tolegally drunk were able to drive better than sober cell
address the issue of whether or not it is safe to talkphone using drivers. A key researcher and author in
on a mobile phone while driving, but rather what typethis field, Psychology Professor David Strayer notes,
of technology is safest for drivers to use while talking"Just like you put yourself and other people at risk
on their mobile phones". They also state their intent iswhen you drive drunk, you put yourself and others at
to "educate drivers on options for using mobile phonesrisk when you use a cell phone and drive. The level of
comfortably and responsibly while driving". Given thatimpairment is very similar." Also, consider they found
the goal is safety education, is this researchmotorists to be more accident-prone and slower to
responsibly comprehensive to consider it a relevantreact when talking on cellular telephones. It did not
and reliable source?Surely, as you go about your ownmatter if it was hands-free either because of
assessment the idea of freeing up both hands to"inattention blindness", a syndrome that makes a driver
control the steering wheel is a logical consideration. If aless able to process visual information.3) The George
driver focuses exclusively on driving the vehicle, thenInstitute for International Health (University of Sydney,
two hands on the wheel is better than one.Australia), Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
Unfortunately, this seemingly sensible approach can(Arlington, Virginia) and Injury Research Centre,
lead to a false sense of driver security (possiblyUniversity of Western Australia (Crawley Australia)
increasing crash risk) as noted in various reports ( byjointly presented research entitled "Role of mobile
the Crash Investigation Team at Virginiaphones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital
Commonwealth University Center for Public Safety.attendance: a case-crossover study". The research
Their findings illustrated that the cognitive resourcesconsisted of 456 drivers aged 17 years who owned or
required to carry on a phone conversation areused mobile phones and had been involved in road
equivalent to those necessary to drive. This is ancrashes requiring hospital attendance between April
important concern given VCU's history of2002 and July 2004. They concluded that a driver who
transportation safety research, as well as otheruses a mobile phone (up to 10 minutes prior to a crash)
studies concluding this behavior (carrying on a phonehas a four times higher likelihood of crashing and an
conversation while driving), reduces both driver reactionincreased likelihood of a crash resulting in injury. Using a
time and driver attentiveness, especially as they relatehands-free phone is not any safer.Eliminate the Risk &
to braking.Unlike a computer, humans have a limitedKeep the BenefitsIf you are the head of a household,
capacity to process simultaneous information. If thea guardian or the parent of a less experienced driver,
software on your computer seems to slow down, youyour decision to allow any in-vehicle cell phone use
might consider increasing the memory or processorcarries a major emotional and financial risk. If you are a
speed to compensate for delays resulting from anfleet manager or you employ individuals that conduct
overload in computing capacity. We as humans havework-related conversations while driving, the risk of
a similar limitation when it comes to processing tooliability for distracted accidents could fall on you.
much information, but unlike computers, our resourcesStrongly consider the legal ramifications for the
are somewhat fixed. Given the inherent delays in ourcareless operation of an employee-owned or
own thought response time when faced withcompany-supplied vehicle before deciding to ignore the
increased load factors, is it practical or safe to hold ainherent danger created by a major cognitive
cell phone conversation while driving a motordistraction such as a cell phone.Obviously, there are no
vehicle?Source: Government Transportation Safetyeasy or certain solutions without sacrifice of
ResearchThe US government employs many of theconvenience. Remember that the benefit of having a
top transportation safety experts and funds a majorcell phone (emergency use and times when you are
portion of the world's accident prevention research.not operating a vehicle) is not lost just because it
Given the effects traffic accidents and relatedremains off while driving. If you consider the facts
congestion have on US productivity, accident reductionpresented by relevant and reliable sources, it really is
is a top priority. Considering that distracted drivingnot a matter of a trade off after all, but an opportunity
accounted for at least 6.4 percent of crash fatalities into prevent an accident or possibly a fatality. In the
2004 (U.S. Department of Transportation), manymean time, until it is proven otherwise, think about
researchers are looking closely at the distinguishinginstigating a life saving strategy NOW for the safe use
distraction caused by cell phone use in vehicles.of cell phones - limit yourself, loved ones and
Furthermore, of the many potential distractions in aemployees to use (personal and business) only when
vehicle, cell phones are considered equally or morethe vehicle is in park!Gary S. Rothstein is the President
dangerous than the other known distractions such asof Mobile Awareness, a company which designs and
eating, reading a map or grooming while operating amarkets vehicle safety products.